Brian Baker
I.
The film Contact (1997)
 begins with a striking effects sequence. After the title, the film 
begins with a shot of the Earth from low orbit, in shadow. On the 
soundtrack, contemporary rock music plays. Both visual and aural signs 
mark this to be ‘now’, our present day. The camera (virtually) begins to
 recede, and as it does, the sound stage alters. A phrase ‘obviously a 
major malfunction’ is heard, taken from the reporting of the Challenger 
space shuttle disaster of 1986, and the music segues through 1980s pop 
into disco. A phrase from the theme music of the long-running tv series Dallas
 (1978-1991) is heard, as the Earth and then Moon shrink, in silhouette,
 displaced by the brightness of the Sun. As the camera recedes from 
Earth and travels outwards in the Solar System, other phrases from 20th 
century America are heard: Richard Nixon saying ‘I’m not a crook’; Neil 
Armstrong’s ‘one small step for man’; Martin Luther King’s ‘free at 
last’. As the camera swings past Jupiter, we hear of John F. Kennedy’s 
assassination, then Dean Martin singing ‘Volare’, and a member of HUAC 
demanding ‘have you ever been a member of the Communist party?’; at 
Saturn, the Lone Ranger calling ‘Hi-ho Silver’, and an FDR ‘fireside 
chat’. All the while, the volume decreases, descending towards silence 
as the intensity of broadcasts decrease, as the camera ‘travels’ further
 out, leaving the Solar System then the Milky Way itself behind, then 
moving ever faster away from tiny spiral galaxies disappearing into the 
distance. The screen is then overcome with whiteness, the edge of the 
universe; the screen then fades up from white, still ‘zooming out’, as 
the camera shows the reflection of a window in a young girls’ pupil, who
 we see finally at a desk, transmitting on short-wave radio: ‘This is 
CQ, W-9 GFO’. She picks up a contact, receiving in Pensacola, Fla., some
 thousand miles distant, ‘the furthest one yet’, as her father watches 
benignly. She marks this on a map of the USA.
In
 this sequence, political history (of the USA) is mixed up with musical 
markers from popular culture and music, recognisable emblems of 
particular eras. Space is signified by time: the further out from the 
Sun we travel, the further back in time we seem to go. Earth is itself a
 ‘planet of sound’, a tiny mote of dust in the sky, soon lost to our 
vision, but human broadcasts penetrate the vast distances of space in a 
way that human beings themselves cannot. The earliest human broadcasts, 
travelling at the speed of sound, may (without degradation) have reached
 around 100 light years distant by the end of the first decade of the 
21st century, though it would take alien intelligences to have developed
 receiving equipment far beyond the tolerances and sensitivity of even 
the most advances arrays on Earth to be able to hear (and later, watch) 
them. Contact plays a strange double game in its opening minutes: while the opening effects sequence emphasises physical distance (the time taken for signals, at the speed of sound, to travel across space), the images of the girl at her ham radio emphasises instantaneity of ‘contact’, that distance in space
 is countermanded by broadcast technologies, where a form of 
tele-presence makes it seem as though someone a thousand miles distant 
is sitting right next to you. The physical realities of sound, distance 
and time are then subject, in Contact,
 to a wider fantasy of instantaneity of contact, one that will have 
increasingly metaphysical (as well as psychological/ emotional) 
implications as the narrative progresses.
Despite its Anglophone and North American bias, Contact’s
 opening is of particular interest because it reads contemporary history
 through sound broadcast technologies: radio (wireless), in particular. 
The universe itself, of course, emanates radio-frequency signals as part
 of its fabric, not only from sources such as pulsars but as part of 
background radiation, and the Search for Extra-Terrestrial Life program 
(SETI) has used radio-telescope arrays to try to filter out possible 
extra-terrestrial transmissions from the background ‘noise’ of the 
universe. By focusing on radio, Contact
 emphasises the fundamental contiguity between human activity (sound 
broadcasts) and the universe itself, and marks human history through its
 audio footprint, almost as if human life began with radio, Marconi as 
Adam. Extra-terrestrial scientists, perhaps, will gauge human 
‘intelligence’ (or otherwise) through its capacity to produce audio 
transmissions. Paradoxically, Earth becomes visible as a ‘planet of sound’.
Radio
 is one of the sound technologies which came into being in the second 
half of the 19th century, which also included telegraphy, the telephone,
 and recording via phonograph cylinders (principles later developed into
 the gramophone/ phonograph, and audio tape). Jonathan Sterne, in The Audible Past (2003), has argued that sound recording is continuous with the 19th century’s cultures of death, in that it seeks to preserve
 the voice of the dead subject and prevent decay. Sterne connects this 
to the development of canning technologies in the food industry and also
 to the arts of embalming. In a sense, preservation of the voice is then
 a way to efface or overcome time and its depredations (allowing that 
the recording technologies themselves do not degrade over time). Sterne 
argues that emblematic of the reifying imperatives of what he calls 
(derived from Matei Calinescu) ‘bourgeois modernity’, a way of ‘managing
 time’ itself: sound recordings offer ‘repeatable time within a 
carefully bounded frame’.(1) 
 However, Sterne goes on to suggest that ‘the scheme of permanence [...]
 was essentially hyperbole, a Victorian fantasy. Repeatability from 
moment to moment was not the same thing as preservation for all time’.(2)  Recorded sound offered the possibility of repetition, of playback of the voice after death; however, playback itself, on cylinders or gramophone records, relies on the same technologies of material inscription
 that constitute recording: the needle touches the vinyl groove, and in 
touching, marks it, degrades it. Repeated playback is another slow fade 
into white noise, undifferentiation, and death. 
The
 term ‘white noise’, which will become increasingly important to this 
article, is drawn from the frequency spectrum. Within the audio range, 
we hear different tones or notes when a particular frequency length 
predominates. When all frequencies within the audible range are equally 
present, resulting in a ‘flat’ sound spectrum , then what the human ear 
hears is ‘white noise’. White noise is undifferentiated sound, deemed 
‘white’ through analogy with light, where the presence of all visible 
frequencies results in white light. The relation of transmission or 
signal to white noise is one that that has haunted analogue sound 
reproduction technologies from their inception.
Most notably, Jeffrey Sconce has investigated the history of this ‘haunting’ with regard to sound and vision technologies. In Haunted Media
 (2000), Sconce outlines three recurrent ‘cultural fantasies’ that have 
accompanied the development of telecommunications technologies: (1) 
‘these media enable an uncanny form of disembodiment’; (2) the 
imagination of a ‘sovereign electronic world’, an ‘electronic 
elsewhere’; and (3) ‘the anthropomorphization of media technology’, most
 visible in a fascination with androids and cyborgs.(3) 
 In his chapter on radio, Sconce suggests that ‘enthusiastic celebration
 of the emerging medium [was accompanied and challenged by texts ] 
suggesting an eerie and even sinister undercurrent to the new electronic
 worlds forged by wireless’.(4)  In fact, we might suggest that sound broadcast technologies enabled an uncanny form of embodiment
 through tele-presence, the belief that the other was somehow present in
 the room as you spoke to them via radio or telephone. In either sense, 
we can ascertain that telecommunication technologies disrupted the 
‘metaphysics of presence’ diagnosed by Jacques Derrida and others as 
central to Western metaphysics, a privileging of speech over writing, of
 the voice over text, that makes the voice the embodiment of truth and of authenticity. In this phonocentrism,
 as Derrida called it, writing is seen to be derived from a pre-existing
 orality, a ‘natural’ form of communication that is prior to ‘the 
fateful violence of the political institution’.(5) 
 Derrida, of course, sought to undo this binary which privileged voice 
over writing, and argued that writing preceded, and was the condition 
and ground of speech. After the advent of telecommunications 
technologies, voice itself becomes disembodied, no longer physically 
connected to a subject who speaks. Tele-presence is at one and the same 
time presence and not-presence, offering the fantasy of ‘instantaneity of contact’ but at the same time emphasising that the other speaker is not there. 
When talking with Bernard Stiegler about television in Echographies of Television (2002),
 Derrida asserts that technologies of the image are bound up with acts 
of ‘magic’ or ‘faith’, ‘by our relation of essential incompetence to 
technical operation’.(6)  ‘For if we don’t know how something works’, Derrida continues,  
our
 knowledge is incommensurable to the immediate perception that attunes 
us to technical efficacy, to the fact that “it works”; we see that “it 
works”, but even if we know
 this, we don’t see how it “works”; seeing and knowing are 
incommensurable here. [...] And this is what makes our experience so 
strange. We are spectralized by the shot, captured or possessed by 
spectrality in advance. [...] What has [...] constantly haunted me in 
this logic of the spectre is that it regularly exceeds all the 
oppositions between visible and invisible, sensible and insensible. A 
spectre is both visible and invisible, both phenomenal and 
nonphenomenal.(7)  
Although
 Derrida uses the discourse of visibility here, his addition of 
‘sensible and insensible’ crucially extends the idea of the ‘specter’ to
 the frequency range of audio, in its disruption of presence. In his 
attempt to situate the problematic of how telecommunication technologies
 in relation to human knowledge, Derrida allows media to escape 
discourses of science, the rational (or of knowledge itself) and so it 
enters the numinous, the ‘electronic elsewhere’, where our relation to 
it can only be uncanny (and/ or theological: we must believe
 that it works, even if we don’t know how it works, a ‘technical 
efficacy’ that must always elude us.) Telecommunications technologies, 
broadcast media, are then spectralized, ‘haunted’, by this strangeness. 
In terms of the developing communication technologies of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, both transmission and reproduction
 of sound are ‘haunted’ by ghosts. Recording the voice, according to 
Sterne, is part of a culture of preservation and memorialization of the 
dead; Joe Banks, in ‘Rorschach Audio’, reports that ‘Edison and Marconi 
both believed that radio technology might enable contact with the 
afterlife’.(8) 
 In his short story ‘Wireless’ – analysed by Sconce and Warner – Rudyard
 Kipling imagines a young man who, entering into a kind of fugue state, 
becomes a kind of human ‘receiver’ (or we might say ‘medium’) for the 
transmission of one of Keats’ poems, which he writes down as if 
transcribing a message: a poem the young man does not consciously know. 
The mystery of this act is maintained by the short story until the end: 
the act of transmission itself, a kind of aetheric emanation picked by a
 ‘sensitive’, remains unexplained. Here we might also return to the film
 Contact.
 The young girl, Ellie Alloway, asks her father, if she had powerful 
enough equipment, ‘Could I talk to ... the Moon?’, going on to add 
‘Jupiter?’, ‘Saturn?’, and then, ‘Mom?’. When her father unexpectedly 
dies, the loss of her mother is compounded, and after the father’s 
funeral, immediately prior to a cut across time to the older Ellie 
(played by Jodie Foster), we see the girl, once again transmitting on 
her short-wave radio, calling ‘Dad, this is Ellie: come back? Dad, are 
you there? Come back.’ Talking across space is twice encoded as talking 
to the ‘electronic elsewhere’, hoping to hear the voices of the dead. 
In the film Frequency
 (2000), John Sullivan (Jim Caviziel) plays a man who lost his own 
father Frank (Dennis Quaid) in a fire when he was young. It begins in a 
similar way to Contact:
 on the soundtrack, dislocated phrases from radio broadcasts are heard 
while the visual track shows image from space, here the plumes of solar 
flares that will create unusual atmospheric conditions on Earth on two 
days 30 years apart, 10 October 1969 and 1999. Effects-shots of the 
aurora borealis behind the Queensborough Bridge in New York emphasise 
both material locatedness (this is a New York story: Frank was a fireman
 while John is a detective in the NYPD) and
 strangeness, the presence of the uncanny, the sky ‘haunted’ by the 
lights. The bridge also symbolises the connection between the two 
time-periods, as the film intercuts between them, and largely focuses on
 the relationship between Frank and his young son. The technological 
‘bridge’ between the time-periods is short-wave radio, and the backyard 
mast is prominently displayed against the borealis several times. Frequency matches time through
 space: John still lives in the house he grew up in , while his widowed 
mother lives elsewhere, and the film regularly intercuts the older John 
pacing around the house, himself haunting its spaces, with images of the
 family life he lost upon the death of his father.(9) 
 The ham radio itself, discovered in the NYFD trunk of his father, 
becomes an uncanny object; its old valves fail, but the receiver seems 
to start into life of its own accord when Frank begins to broadcast on 
it in 1969, and John receives its messages across time. When John 
informs his father that he is to die in a warehouse fire on October 
12th, he alters the timeline (we see direct evidence of this when 
contact with his father on the radio causes his father to burn the desk 
he is sitting at, the burn mark appearing under John’s hand as he 
speaks): his father survives, but it is only at the end of the film 
(after a long diversion into a serial-killer procedural narrative) that a
 kind of wish-fulfilment of emotional restitution is enacted. John’s 
final ‘new’ timeline gifts him with the family life he lost once his 
father died: Frequency’s imagination of haunted radio directly undoes the trauma of loss. 
Both Contact and Frequency,
 although science fiction films (one a ‘first contact’ narrative, the 
other a time-paradox story), can both be said to incorporate elements of
 what is known as ‘EVP’, or electronic voice phenomena. This is a focus 
of para-psychological research whereby it is understood that the 
‘voices’ of the dead can be found imprinted upon the ambient sounds (or 
‘noise’) produced when recording in an ordinary empty room. This began 
in the mid-1930s with the artist Attila von Szalay, who, in his 
darkroom, heard ‘the voice of his deceased brother calling his name.’(10) 
 After unsuccessful attempts to record these voices on a phonograph, he 
was finally successful when using a reel-to-reel tape recorder in the 
1950s. This technological advance is important. Around the same time, 
Friedrich Jürgenson, a Swedish documentary film-maker, attempted to 
record birdsong (also on tape recorder) in his garden, but found, on 
playback, that he ‘heard his dead father’s voice and then the spirit of 
his deceased wife calling his name’.(11)  Upon publishing his findings in 1959, his book Radio Contact with the Dead was read by the Jungian psychologist and philosopher, Dr Konstantin Raudive. Raudive’s book Breakthrough
 (1971) was literally that in the popular imagination, and is a curious 
example of what might be termed ‘spiritualism in the age of electronic 
reproduction.’ The book’s subtitle, ‘An Amazing Experiment in Electronic
 Communication with the Dead’ marks its significance as a ‘scientific’ 
text that purports to reveal the intersection of spectrality, 
life-after-death communication and analogue recording devices. In the 
book, Raudive ‘hears’ or decodes voices of the dead (‘speaking’ in 
English, German, and Raudive’s native Latvian) emanating from the 
background hiss and rumble of recorded ambient sound: he asks questions 
of an empty room and records the ‘answers’.  
Raudive’s
 work is a common touchstone for critics considering haunted media. For 
Sconce, Raudive presents himself and the EVP project as radically 
antithetical to Freudian depth-psychology: 
the
 Raudive voices did speak of an immortal essence that transcends 
alienating models of Darwin, Freud, Sartre, and all other demystifying 
assaults on the transcendental dimension of the human psyche.  The 
irony, of course, is that Raudive remystified the soul through the 
validating authority of an electronic technology.(12)    
However,
 Sconce asserts a fundamental homology between Freud’s and Raudive’s 
intentions: ‘At their core, both of these ‘interpretative’ sciences 
shared the hope that their practices overcome the trauma of a profound loss’.(13)
 Joe Banks, in ‘Rorschach Audio’, takes an extremely sceptical view, 
suggesting that ‘EVP experimenters are psychologists who have 
misunderstood their own work; [...] [they] are inadvertently reproducing
 acoustic projection experiments’, making the analogy to Rorschach 
ink-blots.(14) 
 Mike Kelley, in ‘An Academic Cut-Up’ also refers to Rorschach blots, 
but understands Rorschach’s experiments both as technological 
Spiritualism and as a way-station in the history of twentieth-century 
experiments in sound, particularly in the musical avant-garde: ‘one is 
hyperconscious of the fact that the distortion of the recording process 
[in EVP] is the primary experience,’ he suggests.(15)   My own reading of Raudive’s work would emphasise three main elements:  
(1) the centrality of naming
 in EVP. Von Szalay hears his brother call his name; they call Raduive 
by name, over and over again: Konstantin, Koste, Kosti.  Naming, 
interpellation, calling into being: a crucial way of making meaning in 
EVP seems to circulate around the name, the act of being identified by 
EVP event, call into presence by an act of hearing/ decoding. 
(2)
 The centrality of trauma to the experience. Von Szalay and Jürgenson 
hear the voices of dead relatives; Raudive’s recently departed mother 
looms large in the catalogue of voices, and she is the first catalogued 
figure to be identified in in Breakthrough; on reading transcriptions of the EVP events, Raudive ‘hears’ many dead friends.(16)  
(3) Thirdly, the common technological device here is magnetic audio tape.
Where
 Kittler notes the gramophone as a storage device / externalisations of 
memory becomes a metaphor for a figure for human consciousness itself, tape has
 different qualities: ‘tapes can execute any possible manipulation of 
data because they are equipped with recording, reading, and erasing 
heads, as well as with forward and reverse motion’.(17)   (Kittler also notes, pace
 Paul Virilio, that it is war, here the experiments by BASF and AEG used
 by the Abwehr in World War Two, that accelerate magnetic tape 
production, rather than steel tape, towards general or consuming usage 
in the post-war period.)(18)  As N. Katherine Hayles has it, in How We Became Posthuman (1999), ‘audio tape was a technology of inscription, but with the crucial difference that he admitted erasure and rewriting’: 
Whereas
 the phonograph produced objects that could be consumed only in the 
manufactured form, magnetic tape allows the consumer to be a producer as
 well.  The switches activating the powerful and paradoxical 
technoconceptual actors of repetition and mutation, presence and 
absence, were in the hands of the masses, at least the masses who could 
afford the equipment.(19)  
Hayles
 writes of how ‘audio tape may already be reaching old age, fading from 
the marketplace as it is replaced by compact discs, computer hypermedia,
 and the like’.(20) 
 The compact cassette is now one of Bruce Sterling’s ‘dead media’, and 
its successor, the CD, is also on the way to obsolescence.(21)
 However, it is the very imperfections of magnetic tape, the ‘wow’ and 
‘flutter’ of the thin, flexible tape passing over the heads, which 
renders it perfect as a ‘haunted’ technology.  Like the ‘ghosting’ of 
analogue television signals (soon also to be obsolete), the imperfection
 of the analogue media artefact is part of its quality, its form. It is,
 of course, it is very imperfection as a recording media – its hiss, its
 rumble, its flutter – which is the very condition of possibility for 
EVP.  As documentary features on the DVD of White Noise
 point out, without the hiss of tape – or in contemporary technology, 
used by EVP experts, the noise generated generated by the hardware of 
solid state Dictaphones – they can be no coalescing of the EVP ‘voice’, 
no recording of the phenomenon.(22)   Without noise, there physically can be no signal. 
The
 main association for popular research into EVP is now called the 
Association Transcommunication. From the ATransC website, it is clear 
that the crucial motivations for the EVP practitioner is to contact a 
lost loved one: to undo trauma.  One of their projects is called ‘Big 
Circle’, which attempts to contact the lost loved ones who now reside in
 the ‘etheric’. Its directors, Lisa and Tom Butler encourage DIY: all 
you need is a tape deck (portable compact cassette recorder), 
microphone, and if possible a computer with spectrum analyzers and 
filters and other sound processors to enhance the listening experience, 
to hear the voices.(23) As Raudive himself writes, ‘the ear cannot hear the voices without technical aids’.(24)
 It is clear from the AA-EVP/ATransC work shown on the documentary that 
the voice phenomena are much simpler to decode than Raudive's: the 
voices of monoglot (English, in the USA) and seem much more immediately 
comprehensible. (Indeed, on page 19 of Breakthrough,
 it seems that the polyglot discourse is a condition of a claim to 
paranormal status for a voice event: polyglot + ‘sensible meaning’ = 
‘voice is paranormal’). It is the democratisation (and technologisation)
 of mediumship that is so striking here – this is not a spectacular 
event, complete with female medium, ectoplasm, table rapping, or other 
visual spectacle: it is seemingly demystified, as simple as taping while
 asking questions of an empty room. 
Where, then, do these voices come from?
 Kelley offers several means by which to explain the EVP phenomena. The 
first is that they are indeed some kind of extra-sensible emanations, 
‘the tortured voices of those in Hell, [...] the taunts of demons, or 
[...] the by-products of some numbing mental process that occurs after 
death’; the second, that they are psycho-acoustic patternings of 
geography: ‘the haunted house, the poltergeist phenomenon, are explained
 as a result of the continuing presence of traumatized spirits or stored
 psychic energy, associated with a given place’.(25) 
 William Burroughs, in his own essay on Raudive, ‘It Belongs to the 
Cucumbers’, is highly sceptical, and suggests that the voices are more 
likely ‘imprinted on the tape by electromagnetic energy generated by the
 unconscious minds of the researchers or people connected with 
them’.(26)  I find a third possibility more suggestive: that EVP 
phenomena are the coming-to-attention of the human ear to the ‘planet of
 sound’ around us. Kelley writes: 
We
 are programmed in such a way to screen out as much extraneous 
information as possible; otherwise we would not be able to deal with the
 amount of external stimuli that constantly bombards us. A tape recorder
 does much the same thing that putting a seashell, or a simple tube, up 
to our ear does – it makes us aware of the amount of white noise that 
continually surrounds us.(27) 
Jonathan Crary, in Suspensions of Perception (2001)
 argued that the idea of attention became increasingly investigated in 
the fields of both psychology and optics in the 19th century. This is 
because of the perceived tendency in human beings (particularly workers,
 it should be noted) towards distraction,
 in what Crary calls ‘an emergent economic system that demanded 
attentiveness of a subject in a wide range of new productive and 
spectacular tasks, but whose internal movement was continually eroding 
the basis of any disciplinary attentiveness’.(28)  The conditions of a 
‘modern’, industrial, increasingly consumption- as well as 
production-oriented economy, pulled the human subject in two directions:
 firstly, the bombardment of what Walter Benjamin has called the ‘shock’
 of modern existence (urban living, machinery, speed, advertising, etc) 
creates an increasingly distracted subject in an increasingly 
kaleidoscopic world; and secondly, that the very economic conditions 
that produce this kind of world require a working subject who is able to
 maintain long periods of attentiveness to complex and repetitive tasks 
(over a 10- or 12-hour working day in a factory, for instance). The 
disciplining of visual attention that Crary diagnoses can be extended to the field of sound reproduction and transmission; aural
 attention is required to prevent a kind of distraction of the senses 
through sonic overload in a world where ‘the skies are filled with 
electro-magnetic slums’, ‘aural garbage [...] aether talk [... and] dead
 city radio transmissions’.(29)  EVP, then, in Gothicised form, makes 
this disciplining of attention itself ‘visible’: it is what we do not, 
or cannot, hear. The image that is repeated continuously in Contact,
 of Ellie Alloway concentrating on the sounds transmitted through her 
headphones (‘no-one listens any more’ says her immediate superior) is 
emblematic of the necessity of aural attention in modernity: Ellie must 
shut out the very ‘planet of sound’ that the film begins with in order 
to contact the ‘electronic elsewhere’. 
II.
Fictional
 or filmic EVP narratives are, like the phenomenon itself, organised 
around overcoming ‘the trauma of a profound loss’.(30)  Contact,
 which, despite being about the search for extra-terrestrial 
intelligence is a classical EVP narrative, expresses Ellie Alloway’s 
search for transmissions explicitly as a recuperation of the loss of her
 mother and father, and when she does indeed achieve ‘contact’ with 
extra-terrestrials, they appear in the very physical form of her Dad. Frequency also
 has at its centre the loss of a parent, where radio-transmitted EVP 
phenomena become stitched into a time-paradox narrative where the trauma
 of loss may not only be overcome, but undone. Both of these films concentrate upon audio transmissions, but another, better-known film that incorporates ‘spirit voices’, Tobe Hooper’s 1982 film Poltergeist,
 has at its centre the ‘snow’ of a television screen after transmission 
on a channel has ended (in the days of analogue signals and 
‘closedown’), the audio white noise accompanied by the unsettling light 
of a cathode-ray tube broadcasting no signal. The poster for the film 
featured the young girl Carol Anne (Heather O’Rourke) sitting directly 
in front of this television, listening intently to ‘voices’ only she 
could hear. The tag-line for the film, dialogue spoken by Carol Anne, 
is: ‘They’re here.’
Where Contact and Frequency concentrated upon the loss of the father-figure, the crucial triangulation in Poltergeist
 is female, and maternal. While the father Steven Freeling (Craig T. 
Nelson) has been morally compromised by his complicity on dubious land 
deals that have sited housing developments on old Native American burial
 grounds (a failure of paternal authority more common in the films of 
producer Steven Spielberg), it is the daughter Carol Anne who becomes 
the subject of the malign attentions of the poltergeists. When she is 
taken to the ‘elsewhere’ in this film, the family call upon the services
 of a team of para-psychological researchers from UC Irvine. When the 
‘scientists’, with technological gear of high-end EVP experimenters 
(video and audio recording, motion sensors, and so on) cannot solve the 
problem of poltergeist activity, they call in the medium, Tangina 
Barrons (Zelda Rubinstein). It is she who realises that the phenomena 
are ‘spirits’ who have not gone into the ‘light’ of the hereafter, and 
that a malign entity has captured both Carol Anne and the attention of 
spirits, preventing them from ‘passing’; and it is she who sends Carol 
Anne’s mother Diana (JoBeth Williams) into the ‘portal’ to retrieve her 
daughter. When they emerge back into the ‘real’ of the house, mother and
 daughter are covered in some kind of ectoplasm, a (re)birth-fluid that 
emphasises feminine and maternal materiality. The core of Poltergeist
 is the recuperation of the mother-daughter bond through the 
ministrations of the female medium/ midwife, preserver of arcane 
knowledge and practices that always-already escape the scientizing 
discourses of the UC Irvine team (who are led by a female scientist, but
 whose practices are resolutely coded as masculine: rational, 
technological, and deeply flawed).
These
 three films, then, can be constellated as a ‘parental’ mode of EVP 
narrative, in which trauma is focused upon the parent/child relationship
 and emotional dynamic. Another group of EVP narratives, which will take
 up the remainder of the essay, are Orphean in nature. Orpheus has, in 
the twentieth century, been a myth recurrently taken up by artists and 
writers who wish to explore artistic creation and transmission, but also
 the imperatives of loss and recuperation. In his Afterword to his 
translation of Rainer Maria Rilke’s ‘Orpheus’ sequence of sonnets, the 
poet Don Paterson writes that Rilke wrote the poems at such speed that 
it seemed to Rilke as though they were being broadcast from elsewhere 
(as in Kipling’s ‘Wireless’), where poetic creation took the form of an 
‘enigmatic dictation’. This exogamous conception of writing leads 
Paterson to propose the poet as a kind of medium:
Someone
 so sensitive that they become not only a lightning rod for all the 
crackling static of the culture, but also a satellite-dish, a ‘receiver’
 (to use a Rilkean favourite) for things a less precisely attuned and 
calibrated sensibility would never be aware of. These individuals 
possess no supernatural powers, but do have abnormally strong sense of 
what’s on the wind for us.(31)     
Orpheus
 is, of course, a mythic figure for the poet, one whose gift is bound up
 with loss. Orpheus, once a priest of Dionysus, is, at the time of his 
marriage, a priest of Apollo. The son of a river god (or perhaps Apollo)
 and Calliope (the Muse of epic poetry), Orpheus is gifted with a 
supernatural ability to play the lyre: his song charms the trees (who 
uproot to come nearer the singer), softens stones, alters nature itself.
 On his wedding day, his bride Eurydice, fleeing the bee-keeper 
Aristaeus, treads upon a snake, is bitten, and dies. The grief-stricken 
Orpheus thereby descends into the Underworld, and through song, 
persuades Persephone and Hades to allow Eurydice to accompany him back 
to the upper world, on one condition: that he does not look back at his 
wife as they ascend. Unfortunately, as they near the upper world, 
Orpheus does look back, either in fear, or anxiety, or through love of 
his wife – and her shade retreats to the underworld. Despite his 
efforts, she may not be released a second time. In some versions of the 
myth, Orpheus then forswears the company of women and takes young male 
lovers. Precipitated by this rejection, women of a Dionysian cult, in an
 intoxicated frenzy, tear Orpheus to pieces; his head and lyre float 
down the river, still lamenting the loss of Eurydice, until they are 
washed ashore on Lesbos, while his shade is reunited with Eurydice in 
the underworld. The head of Orpheus becomes an oracle until Apollo, 
fearing competition with his own oracle at Delphi, silences the head and
 places Orpheus among the stars. 
The
 figure of Orpheus has, from the Medieval period, through the 
Renaissance, Romanticism and to Modern and contemporary literature, has 
been re-imagined as: (a) an emblematic narrative of loss of the loved 
one; (b) a figure of the transcendent power of art and poetry; and (c) 
the imagination of the boundary between the real or quotidian and the 
transcendent or divine. Contemporary SF, fantasy and gothic/ horror 
fictions have used an Orphean narrative pattern, of a journey to an 
‘underworld’, to construct narratives of anxiety, trauma and loss.  
These include films such as Solaris
 (2002), where a voyage to a sentient star, and thereby contact a 
transcendent other, is patterned on the male protagonist’s search for 
the restoration of his lost wife, horror/ SF crossover texts such as Event Horizon
 (1997), where the scientist Weir’s interest in the demonic ship is 
predicated on undoing the trauma of his wife's suicide; and, in 
different ways,  both White Noise (2005) and Frozen (2005), films I will consider in more detail shortly.  
While
 all these films connect EVP phenomenon with loss, there are significant
 differences, which can be expressed in tabular form. (Bold indicates 
video-based EVP; italics signify audio-based EVP.) 
                                                                                Parental                  Orphean
          Orphean 
                                                   
                                               Female                     Poltergeist                               Frozen
                                                                                 Contact 
                                                 Male                                                                     White Noise       
                                                                             
                                                                              Frequency Orphée
                             Orphée 
In Jean Cocteau’s Orphée (1950),
 Jean Marais plays Orpheus, a poet who fears losing his gifts, and who 
suffers the loss of his wife when Orpheus’s Death (personified by Maria 
Casares) falls in love with him, and deceives him by sending messages 
via car radio which he then copies down and presents to the public, to 
great success, as his own work. Some of these are numbers (referring to 
the coded broadcasts of the BBC to French Resistance fighters in 
Occupied France in World War 2), but some have a dislocated, surreal 
quality: ‘A single glass of water lights up the world’; ’Jupiter 
enlightens those he would destroy’.  The exogenous nature of Orpheus’s 
poetry – it is actually composed by his great (and deceased) young 
rival, Cégeste – connects Cocteau’s Orphée
 to Rilke, but also to EVP: these are disembodied voices, calling via 
sound broadcast technologies, with mysterious intention. Orpheus asks 
the angel Heurtebise ‘Where can they be coming from?’ It is, of course, 
from the ‘electronic elsewhere’. Cocteau’s Orpheus does indeed retrieve 
his Eurydice from the underworld, and although the prohibition about 
looking back at his wife remains intact, this version of the narrative 
does not end in disaster (and dismemberment), but in a kind of triumph 
over Death, albeit mysterious and problematic.
In White Noise (2005), communication devices abound: cell phones, answer phones, TV, video, computer screens all feature heavily in the mise-en-scène. 
 These devices, lyres for the electronic age, allow a bridge to be 
formed between quotidian and other- or under-worlds.  The haunted nature
 of telephonic/ telegraphic communication is figured directly as 
communication with ghosts, and particularly with the spirit of a lost 
wife.  Michael Keaton plays Jonathan Rivers, an architect (the sign of 
ratio, of Apollo) whose second wife tells him she is pregnant before she
 drives into the city for a meeting.  She never returns.  Her car is 
found by the river with a flat tyre, and her body is eventually 
discovered up-river, taken there by the tide.  In the protagonist’s name
 and this location we find reference to the Styx/ Lethe imagery that is 
much more overt in Frozen,
 but also the birth imagery that Brian Jarvis notes as significant in 
the J-horror variant on haunted tape and the invasion-horror narrative, Ringu. (32)  (In Frozen,
 Annie, the lost sister, has also recently had a child; we see the baby 
with the ‘abandoned’ father.) Ultimately, the narrative descends into 
both spirit-invasion horror (malignant spirit entities as in Poltergeist)
 and, in a curious genre-swerve, serial killer narrative, where the 
wife’s death was murder, not accidental, and is one of a sequence that 
the serial-killer offers up to the malign spirit entities.  Frozen makes
 the same swerve when revealing, at the point of the female 
protagonist’s death at his hands, that the abandoned father of his 
sister’s child is in fact the murderer of both sisters.  
At first, in White Noise, televisual imaging technology (home movies shown on TV) are not connected to EVP.  As in the figure of John Anderton in Minority Report (2002),
 whose watching of holographic images of his lost son are meant to 
comfort but merely compound the trauma of loss, Rivers seeks out 
videotapes of his life with his lost wife as an index of unrecuperated 
trauma.  The promise of all these haunted technologies is, ultimately, 
the restoration of a form of life to the dead: as Terry Castle notes in The Female Thermometer,
 the phantasmagoria entrepreneur/inventor Etienne-Gaspard Robertson, 
when introducing the show ‘emerged, spectrelike, from the gloom, and 
addressing the audience, offered to conjure up the spirits of their dead
 loved ones’.(33)  The bridge formed by these technologies, as we saw 
with Frequency, is not only to the spirit world, but also to the past, the time in which the loved one was not lost.  
This literal nostalgia, this return home to a time before loss/trauma, is indicated in the mise-en-scène of White Noise.
 Rivers’ home and office are photographed with a cool, grey-blue 
palette: chrome, brushed steel and glass predominate.  After he moves to
 an apartment following his wife’s death, this becomes still more 
emphasised, the blue light of cathode ray screens reflecting from 
glass-brick walls.  When Rivers is approached by an EVP specialist, 
Raymond Price (Ian McNeice), who tells him Rivers’ wife has contacted 
him, the initially sceptical Rivers visits Price’s home.  The mise-en-scène here
 is markedly different: the clapboard house contains rooms lit in shades
 of red and brown, the space cluttered, old rugs on the floor.  Unlike 
Rivers apartment, this base is homely, heimlich
 perhaps, although part of the clutter is the EVP equipment itself: 
tapes, video recorders, computer, and a DAT player.  The room bespeaks 
the past, and the technology of the past; it is as though Price has 
heard voices through a crystal radio set in his front room (echoing the 
ham radio activities of Ellie Alloway in Contact).
 In a sense, this is exactly what he has been doing; EVP as 
do-it-yourself radiophonics.(34)  If Price’s house is homely, then 
Rivers deliberately dislocates himself from ‘home’.  He moves from a 
house shared with his lost wife to a cold, modern apartment building in 
the city.  Perhaps the house is haunted by the memories of his wife, and
 indeed it is here that Rivers is seen watching home movies; and the 
move to the blank new apartment becomes an attempt to escape these 
ghosts.  But it is here, through tape and EVP that the ghost of his wife
 manifests itself.  It is the very blankness of the modern apartment 
that calls forth the ghost.  
This
 narrative, like others mentioned above, combines Orpheus motifs, 
technology and the numinous or transcendent.  They place a male questing
 protagonist at the centre of narrative agency. In the figures of von 
Szalay, Jurgenson, Raudive, and in White Noise
 Rivers and Price, EVP is represented as a male activity, the technology
 perhaps inverting the paradigm of female mediumship. As Sconce and 
Marina Warner note, from the Fox sisters on, there is an interesting 
implication of gender in Spiritualism – a gender politics.  Sconce 
writes: ‘spiritualism empowered women to speak in public, often about 
very controversial issues facing the nation’.(35)   In spirit 
photography, it is William Crookes or William Hope photographing female 
mediums; and in spiritualism, the female does not speak:
 she is a medium for others. The media (photography/ tape) that will 
prove the scientific fact of the existence of post mortem life (spirits,
 voices) is coded as male; the mediums that are the focus are female. In
 White Noise,
 Rivers visits a blind female seer, a medium, who cautions him against 
EVP, warning him not to ‘meddle’.  The conflict between the archetypal 
female medium, and the technophile male EVP experimenter, bespeaks a 
kind of gender problematic in these Orpheus narratives, and perhaps an 
attempt to wrest the figuring of the ‘electronic elsewhere’ into the 
realm of the masculine.
Frozen
 (2005), on the other hand, is certainly a text which uses EVP motifs – 
the imprinting of a strange image on to surveillance CCTV tape – but in 
the service of a narrative which focuses on female, and sisterly, loss. 
 When Kath, the surviving sister (Shirley Henderson) of a disappeared 
woman visits the alleyway where CCTV images of her sister were captured,
 she has a vision whereupon she stands upon tidal sands, while what she 
takes to be her sister walks upon a sandbank across and inlet or creek. 
 As the film progresses, and the number of these visions increases, the 
Orpheus patterning becomes more apparent: a boat is seen, rowed by the 
blind ferryman Charon, and when she discusses her visions with a 
counsellor/priest (Roshan Seth) he explicitly decodes them as a 
Greco-Roman underworld.(36) 
The
 counsellor/priest’s discourse runs directly counter to the scientific, 
demystifying impulses of Raudive and other EVP experimenters.  The 
priest says to Kath: ‘some things are beyond understanding and we just 
have to accept them as mysteries’.  At the same time, when Kath shows 
him a printout of the uncanny image on the CCTV tape, in return he shows
 her a Rorschach ink blot, indicating that her meaning-making, of Annie 
as a dead and her visions as uncanny, is faulty. Later in the film, the 
image on the ‘blot’ becomes clearer, like a very slowly developing 
Polaroid photograph.  It is revealed to be a close up of a two-shot 
taken while Annie and Kath were on a roller-coaster, their happy faces 
pressed together.  Whilst Kath only finds herself, not Annie, wandering 
the underworld sands in her visions, this image does suggest (albeit 
sentimentally) that the two sisters are reunited in death.  Through 
Kath’s visions, which we see as a cinematic ‘real’, the afterlife is 
presented as a kind of truth or reality, just as in EVP.
Frozen
 returns to the figure of the female visionary, though Kath’s mediumship
 is overtly bound up with trauma and loss, and possible psychological 
disintegration. Kath ends up ‘channelling’ her own death, seeing her own
 face, when Jonathan Rivers in White Noise sees
 the deaths of others.  He does not see his own death, even though his 
EVP visions become proleptic/prophetic/prophylactic in form.  However, 
the last image of White Noise
 is Rivers, with his wife, amidst the visual snow of blank videotape 
playback, looking back out of the screen at us.  Where Kath and Annie 
are bound up with each other, White Noise’s final visual gesture is to turn to the audience.
Why? 
 The film is explicitly a cautionary tale, and on-screen titles warn 
that one in 12 EVP events our threatening in nature.  It is also a 
warning against the Orpheus narrative, of looking back over one’s 
shoulder, of nostalgia.  After Rivers funeral, his son, first wife and 
her current husband sit in their car.  The radio comes on of its own 
accord, and we hear Keaton’s voice, as an EVP, say ‘I’m sorry’ to son 
who, somewhat curiously, seems pleased by this event.  What is striking 
about certain sequences in this film is not the use of EVP, nor the 
spirit-invasion narratives, but the images of the son, playing alone, on
 the father, in another room, watched blank tape in a search for his 
wife.  In inhabiting nostalgia, in wanting to restore the past, in an 
inability to overcome the trauma of loss, Rivers neglects his son, and 
present time.  The real locus of anxiety (and pathos) in White Noise is not the bereaved lover, but the neglectful/forgetful father. 
III.
There is one film that uses EVP motifs I have deliberately refrained from mentioning so far: M. Knight Shyamalan’s The Sixth Sense
 (1999). There is indeed a ‘lost wife’ in this film, but, of course, the
 ‘twist’ in this narrative is that Dr Malcolm Crowe (Bruce Willis), the 
psychologist who treats a traumatised child who ‘sees dead people’ (Cole
 Sear, played by Haley Joel Osment) is himself dead, only a ghost. Cole 
tells Crowe that the ghosts ‘only see what they want to see’, and while 
this bears upon Crowe’s ongoing self-delusion as a ghost who believes 
himself to be alive, it also indicates the failure of rationality and 
scientific/ medical discourse to deal with the real cause of Cole’s 
trauma: he really does see dead people. As the narrative nears its end, 
Dr Crowe realises that the causes of his own death lie in the roots of 
his rational world-view. His home invaded by a traumatised former 
patient, Crowe is shot, and the film seems to take place after his 
recovery, but in fact occurs after his death. Crowe ‘fails’ Vincent Grey
 (Mark Wahlberg) because he can only see Vincent’s symptoms as internal 
and psychological terms, whereas the truth lies externally: he, too, 
contacts the dead. On playing back a tape of an interview with Grey, 
Crowe hears what he has blocked out all this time, the voices that haunt
 and torture Grey. The EVP manifestation finally makes clear to Crowe 
the limits of his own discourse; and this way is the path not only 
towards understanding his own condition (as ghost), but a form of 
healing for himself and Cole, who stands in and recuperates the damage 
that he could not undo with Vincent Grey. The Sixth Sense
 is then another recuperative narrative, and as he leaves the film (and 
Earth), Crowe is rewarded with the knowledge of his wife’s ongoing love 
for him.
It
 is important to note, by way of conclusion, that the films I have been 
considering here are mainly grouped around the years 1997-2005, with Orphée and Poltergeist
 preceding them. All the films deal with analogue technologies: radio, 
audio tape, video, CCTV. These analogue technologies (excepting CCTV) 
were in decline in this period, and most have now been supplanted by 
digital formats: digital and web radio; vinyl records and audio tape by 
cd and digital downloads; video tape by dvd and video files. (Analogue 
television signals are being ‘switched over’ to digital in the UK at the
 time of writing, nearing the end of a process that has taken several 
years.) For audio tape especially, a nostalgia-inflected culture has 
developed, around the ‘mixtape’ as a particular form of transmission and
 distribution (consumer-led) of music, and vinyl has continued to be 
supported by DJ and remix culture. At the end of their time as consumer 
technologies of sound and visual reproduction, it seems that analogue 
technologies particularly became haunted by the ‘ghosts’ of nostalgia 
and by the very imperfections that rendered them unheimlich.
 The degrading qualities of reproduction of audio and video tape or 
vinyl records inserted them into history as material objects, and 
personal history as bearers of the marks of playback (particularly 
evident in the scratches on vinyl), but the associations conjured by 
this entry into history and memory themselves produced ghosts.
As
 I have argued in the course of this essay, it is the very properties of
 these media which are the ground and condition of their ‘haunted’ 
phenomena, the imperfections of aural and visual reproduction. Without 
noise, as I have stated, there can be no signal. Does the sonic 
‘cleanness’ of digital reproduction mean that communication technologies
 will no longer be uncanny? The use of digital sound recorders by 
contemporary EVP experimenters suggests not: computers, hard disks or 
digital cameras have their own ambient footprints. There is a difference
 between analogue and digital reproduction; however, Bernard Stiegler 
suggests that both can create anxiety:
Analogico-digital
 technology continues and amplifies a process of suspension [that 
interrupts one state of things and imposes another] that began a long 
time ago, in which the analog photograph
 was itself only a singular epoch. And so the process in ancient, but 
the current phase of suspension – in the form of digital photography – 
engenders an anxiety and a doubt which are particularly interesting, but
 particularly threatening.(37)     
It
 is, then, perhaps sound and visual reproduction itself which is 
haunted, rather than specific technologies. In digital artifacts and 
glitches, we may still see ghosts.
1 Jonathan Sterne, The Audible Past: Cultural Origins of Sound Reproduction (Durham NC: Duke University Press, 2003), p.310.
2 Sterne, p.332.
3 Jeffrey Sconce, Haunted Media: Electronic Presence from Telegraphy to Television (Durham NC: Duke University Press, 2000), pp.8-9.
4 Sconce, p.62.
5 Jacques Derrida, Of Grammatology (1967), trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976), p.36.
6 Jacques Derrida and Bernard Stiegler, Echographies of Television, trans. Jennifer Bajorek (Cambridge: Polity, 2002), p.117.
7 Derrida and Stiegler, p.117.
8 Joe Banks, ‘Rorschach Audio: Ghost Voices and Perceptual Creativity’, Leonardo Music Journal, 11: 2001, 77-83 (p.83). 
9
 In John Cheever’s ‘The Enormous Radio’ (1947), a radio set picks up the
 conversations of other families in an apartment block, allowing the 
owners of the radio to eavesdrop on others. The result of this 
‘haunting’ is that the couple’s own suppressed history, its secrets , 
come to the surface once more. John Cheever, ‘The Enormous Radio’, The Enormous Radio and Other stories (New York: Funk and Wagnalls, 1953)
10 Sconce, p.84.
11 Sconce, p.84.
12 Sconce, p.90.
13 Sconce, p.90; p.91.
14 Banks, p.80.
15
 Mike Kelley, ‘An Academic Cut-up, in Easily Digestible Paragraph-Size 
Chunks; Or, the New King of Pop, Dr. Konstantin Raudive’, Grey Room 11, Spring 2003, 22-43 (p.38). 
16 Konstantin Raudive, Breakthrough: An Amazing Experiment in Electronic Communication With The Dead, trans Nadia Fowler (New York: Taplinger, 1971), p.35.
17 Friedrich Kittler, Gramophone, Film, Typewriter (1986), trans. Geoffrey Winthrop-Young and Michael Wutz (Stanford CA: Stanford University Press, 1999), p.108.
18 Kittler, p.106. See also Paul Virilio, War and Cinema: The Logistics of Perception (London: Verso, 1989)
19 N. Katherine Hayles, How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Infomatics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999), p.209; p.210.
20 Hayles, p.208.
21 Bruce Sterling, ‘The Life and Death of Media’, Sound Unbound: Sampling, Digital Music and Culture, ed. Paul D. Miller (Cambridge MA: MIT Press), pp.73-82.
22 ‘Hearing is Believing: Actual EVP Sessions’; ‘Making Contact: EVP Experts’; ‘Recording the Life After at Home’. White Noise dvd release, Entertainment in Video, 2005.
23
 The American Association of Electronic Voice Phenomena (AA-EVP) became 
ATransC, Association Transcommunication in 2010: http://atransc.org/, 
accessed 13/1/2012.
24 Raudive, Breakthrough, p.108.
25 Kelley, p. 25; p.29.
26 William S. Burroughs, ‘It Belongs to the Cucumbers’, The Adding Machine: Collected Essays
 (London: John Calder, 1985, pp.53-60 (p.58). A similar conception of 
‘imprinting’ can be found in Nigel Kneale’s television play The Stone Tape (BBC, 1972).
27 Kelley, p.37.
28 Jonathan Crary, Suspensions of Perception: Attention, Spectacle, and Modern Culture (Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2001), p.29.
29 Iain Sinclair and Chris Petit (dirs.), London Orbital (2002); David Toop, Ocean of Sound: Aether Talk, Ambient Sound and Imaginary Worlds (London: Serpent’s Tail, 1995), p.270.
30 Sconce, p.91.
31 Don Paterson, ‘Afterword’ to Orpheus: A Version of Rilke (London: Faber, 2006), pp.61-72 (p.63).
32 Brian Jarvis, ‘Anamorphic allegory in The Ring, or, seven ways of looking at a horror video’, The Irish Journal of Gothic and Horror Studies 3, November 2007. http://irishgothichorrorjournal.homestead.com/ring.html, accessed 1 July 2009.
33 Terry Castle, The Female Thermometer: Eighteenth-Century Culture and the Invention of the Uncanny (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), p.147.
34
 Here we find a connection to narratives of uncanny wireless, such as 
Kipling’s ‘Wireless’ , Friedlander’s ‘Goethe speaks into the phonograph’
 (reproduced in Kittler) and the film Frequency.
  35 Sconce, Haunted Media, p.49.
36 Jayne Steel, who collaborated with the director of Juliet McKeon on the script of Frozen, has confirmed to me that narrative elements of the film are explicitly drawn from the Orpheus myth.
 37 Bernard Stiegler, ‘The Discrete Image’, Echographies of Telelvision, p.149.
http://irishgothichorrorjournal.homestead.com/